Why War

2 Pages 567 Words

Why War
What happens to the aggressive instinct when people unite to form a lawful society they still do violent things but they think it is right because the community backs it. I believe that they still act in violence but they do it through the community so they believe it is not wrong. What it is controlled violence thought the community and nothing else. It is just having the hole community making the dictions in steed of one person , but they are still acting in violence they just have the backing of a majority of the community this is what I believe that they are saying in there letters.
People still have the same instinct for violence they just do not believe it is right for one person to act on it the majority of the community has to believe they did something wrong, and must be punished for it. Basically a jury trial were twelve of your peers decide if you are guilty or not and decide how violent your punishment will be. Like I said it is just the community acting in violence instead of one person. They will punish one person for being violent, but if the whole community backs the act it is ok at least that’s what we think.
I think that if it is the whole community backing it or just one person acting out of rage it is wrong to act out in violence period. But even I act out in violence it is a instinct we can’t break it is necessary for are survival for the human race. I don’t think we could ever live without violence we are not even capable of the thought. I mean sit down and think about it you can’t even picture it you may think you can, but if you look deeper in your thoughts about it even in your perfect society in your mind some were there is some act of violence. This is my opinion you may have a different one and I would like to here it.
The aggressive instinct stays there it is just the way we have been raised that we do not think it is wrong to act out in mild violence or in murder if the community is bac...