Intellectual Truth

16 Pages 4012 Words

For this particular text, I don't suggest you read it online. In fact I recommend that you print it out (which explains the mundane colours) and read it slowly. Devouring every word. If I have misused the English language, I apologize. If I have overlooked brevity and droned on instead, please forgive me. In any case, I present:

The Intellectual Truth

1) The Theory of Evolution versus The Fact of Creation.
Although, evolution is now classified as biology; a scientific study, I still conceive the theory of evolution as purely philosophy. Charles Darwin is no more a biologist than he is a philosopher. I am urged to remind you that the phrase is, ‘the theory of evolution.’ There is no Law of Evolution and there are Laws of Motion and there is no Darwinian Law as there are Newtonian Laws. Time and time again, along the years it seems science and the Laws, not theories but Laws of Mathematical Probability have disproved Darwin’s published thoughts concerning the origin of complex life on Earth. It has been brought to our attention that Charles Darwin had doubts about his own work, however he died believing his theory. "As by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed. Why do we not find them imbedded in the crust of the earth? Why is nature not in confusion instead of being as we see them; well defined species?" asked the great man himself, perhaps as a rhetorical question as he did not recant his theory. The answer, as the website http://www.ishipress.com/creation.htm wrote is easy enough to be answered by any kindergartener, “Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” However, Christian though he was he chose to publish a possibility that could not be ruled out, at least, at that time. Science has advanced too much along the centuries to still grasp on to the philosophy of old that they used to call science. Mathematics proves that not only is it impossible for a SINGLE organism...