An Ideal Criminal Law Process.

3 Pages 758 Words

Introduction
Criminal law is the prosecution of a person for an act that is classified as a crime, an unacceptable act in the limit of conduct in society. In an ideal criminal law process prosecution for crimes would be swift and just. Certain crimes demand certain punishments and the punishments must fit the crime. In an ideal society, of course there would be no crime. In order for this to happen things would have to change in society. Morality for one, Morality is defined as the principals of right and wrong. Humans as moral creatures deserve praise for good deeds and punishment for bad ones

In societies past, punishments were swifter. For example, on September 28, 1953, a young boy was abducted from his school in Kansas City, Missouri. A ransom was demanded and the FBI became involved. The suspects subsequently murdered the young boy on the day of his abduction before the first ransom request was made. This was unbeknownst to the parents and a ransom of $600,000 was paid. On October 6, 1953 the FBI caught the suspects. They appeared before a judge on October 30, 1953, and plead guilty. The jury after hearing the evidence recommended the death penalty after only one hour and eight minutes of deliberation. They were executed on December 18, 1953. (FBI Library) Less than three months after the crime was committed, the punishment was handed out and followed through on. We can learn something from this; the crime was so horrid that the jury had no trouble finding the suspects guilty and to hand down the death penalty. Today that is not usually the case; lawyers try to stack the juries in their favor. To have that one juror to vote his or her way and no matter what the evidence says, that juror will usually vote the opposite of everyone else. A lot of times this is because they feel sorry for the accused. But if the shoe was on the other foot and it was a crime against them they might not feel the same way.

To sh...