Student Performance Analysis

3 Pages 762 Words

There are links between student performance and financial, human, and material resources. School districts that can afford to spend have the resources stand a better chance of having higher performing students. These links also affect teaching and learning. It is pretty simple the more money, parental/community involvement and better materials, equals the more effective teacher. And the end result equals a well educated high performing student. Bear Valley Unified School District’s strategic plan illustrates all of the resources relate to teaching and learning.
The first example of the resources affecting teaching and learning that I saw came from this particular statement in Bear Valley Unified School District’s strategic plan. Number four on the district parameters says: School district policy and expenditure decisions will support the Strategic Plan (http://www.bigbear.k12.ca.us/sarcs/plan.htm).
By supporting the Strategic Plan which includes a lot of benefits for teachers and students shows the district’s commitment to develop its policies and budgets according to achieving what is in the plan. When a person reads this they know that the Bear Valley Unified School District is attempting to do everything in its power to achieve all of the things outlined in its strategic plan. Number six under district parameters stated the following: The school district will not change nor implement programs or activities without provisions for staff training (http://www.bigbear.k12.ca.us/sarcs/plan.htm). This statement articulates that the Bear Valley Unified School District is willing to invest money into staff development to produce better teachers within their school district. If this happens the district will produce better teachers. The more effective teacher will then challenge his/her students to become better learners. Here there seems to be a trickle down effect. By investing in building better teachers in return will p...